Compare
A Supio alternative: Brennick and Supio compared
Supio’s site describes an agentic AI platform for plaintiff and mass tort cases, covering chronologies, demand letters, a case ledger, litigation drafting, intake and case communications. Brennick is case analysis and intake software for plaintiff firms in personal injury and employment.
This page sets what Supio’s own public site says, as read on October 9, 2026, next to what Brennick does. Products change, so check Supio’s site for the current picture.
Their site read on October 9, 2026. Compare
| Topic | Brennick | Supio, per its own site |
|---|---|---|
| What it is for | Case analysis and intake: a case timeline cited to the page, gaps and missing records, a strength assessment and damages range for attorneys, demand drafts, intake with conflict checks, a client portal, and records requests, liens and costs. | Their home page describes agentic AI for plaintiff and mass tort cases: chronologies, demand letters, a case ledger, litigation drafting, intake and case communications.Source: What it is for |
| Who it is built for | Plaintiff firms of any size, in personal injury and employment. | Plaintiff law firms, in personal injury and mass torts.Source: Who it is built for |
| How pricing is presented | Published flat prices per firm: Solo $299, Brief $499 and Docket $799 a month; Enterprise with custom terms by quote. Each plan includes a set number of new cases a month, and extra cases are $10 each. | No prices or pricing page. The call to action is to book a demo.Source: How pricing is presented |
| Are outputs cited to pages | Yes. Every timeline entry cites the page it came from, and the chronology export prints the cited text in an appendix. Quotes behind non-medical case events and Ask this case answers are checked against the cited page in code, and dropped when they are not there. | Their chronologies page says facts are pinned to their source, with citations and links to source files. Page-level linking is not stated.Source: Are outputs cited to pages |
| How attorney review works | A licensed attorney at the firm reviews, edits and approves AI output, and the database refuses an approval from anyone else. Nothing is used before that approval, and every generation and review is written to an append-only audit log. | Their chronologies page describes chronologies verified by human subject matter experts, which users can edit in place.Source: How attorney review works |
| What clients see | Clients never see AI output: no score, damages range, timeline or analysis, in any form, on any plan. The client portal shows the case status, messages, uploads and to-dos. | Their Case Communications page describes calls and texts to clients (missing details, scheduling, reminders, check-ins) that identify themselves as AI and run under attorney or paralegal direction. A client portal is not stated.Source: What clients see |
| File types | PDFs, scans, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, email with its attachments, ZIP files and images are read. Audio and video are stored for the firm’s review and never transcribed. | Not stated on their site as of October 9, 2026.Source: File types |
| Integrations | Clio, Google Calendar and Outlook calendar, on Brief and above. | Litify, SmartAdvocate, Salesforce, RingCentral, CallRail and Westlaw, and a named partnership with Thomson Reuters.Source: Integrations |
| AI phone intake | No. People who call the firm talk to people at the firm. Website intake is a form on the firm’s own intake page. | Yes. Their intake page describes a Voice Agent that answers overflow and after-hours calls 24/7, qualifies leads and transfers to an attorney.Source: AI phone intake |
| Where to learn more | How Brennick works, pricing and the sample documents | supio.com and their security page, supio.com/security |
Why firms pick Brennick
- Prices are published: Solo $299, Brief $499 and Docket $799 a month, flat per firm, with extra cases at $10 each.
- Every timeline entry cites its page, and quotes behind case events and answers are checked against that page in code.
- Only a licensed attorney at your firm can approve AI output, and the database enforces it.
- Clients never see AI output, in any form, on any plan.
- No AI phone intake: people who call your firm talk to people at your firm.
See the output for yourself
Read a sample chronology, then try Brennick on a file you know.